Objection against the Deed of Designation regarding the Forest – Photo Interpretation
Any natural or legal person who has a legal interest has the right to express his objection – objection against the Deed of Designation within 60 days from the last publication or notification of the relevant Deed.
The publication in the press is done either by the Forestry Office , or by the interested party at his own expense in order to start the 60-day period faster for the final judgment.
- The hearing of the objection takes place in the First Instance Forest Dispute Resolution Committee (PEEDA), which has three members, resides in the Court of First Instance of the seat of the relevant Prefecture and usually consists of a judicial officer (most often First Instance), who chairs the committee. of the relevant Forest Department and an agronomist. A new appeal may be lodged against the decision of the committee of first instance.
- The objection is now heard in the competent Court of Appeals in the Secondary Forest Dispute Resolution Committee (DEEDA), which has five members.
- Finally, against the decision of the Secondary Committee, an appeal can be brought before the Council of State by any person (natural or legal) who has a legal interest, within the period of 60 days from the notification of the last publication of the Decision.
An essential tool for supporting and documenting the objection – objection against the Deed of Characterization of the Forest Service , is the Photo Interpretation Study aerial photographs that can technically substantiate the reason for the objection, against the Act of Characterization. The shots of 1945 and 1960 are mainly checked, but also all the other shots taken in the area so that every valuable item can be used in the documentation of the objection.
During the process of the case in each of the above stages, the interested parties should support their objections from a lawyer and an experienced Technical Consultant of a Photo Interpreter. The study examines in depth the history of the place using also any other possible evidence.
So in addition to the complete and timeless study of Photointerpretation such data can be:
- παλαιοί χάρτες
- documents proving the use of the space
- facts from the history of the place
- forestry study
- recent photographic material and its appropriate presentation in three dimensions
- autopsy report
- Historical Photographic Material
- synchronous capture where all the above are distinguished as a position
and much more.
XYZ with extensive experience in matters of Appeals against the Act of Forestry Characterization and given its presence in a large number of forest dispute resolution cases in the respective committees, is able to guarantee your substantial presence in the respective committee, in terms of technical support. It is very important and unfortunately ignored by a large number of people, the fact that the presence of the interested party in the Forest Dispute Resolution Committee, only with his presence (often without the presence of a lawyer) and especially without the support of the case by technical consultant leads to failure, since the testimonies of himself or some relatives and friends alone are not enough to substantiate his objection and most of the time are not taken into account.
The presence of the technical consultant Photojournalist is able to help the committee to understand the reason for the objection, both through the scientific reason it can articulate, and through the process of presenting the interpretation of the Aerial Photographs of the previous years, through maps. and diagrams that he will have drawn up, regarding the use and land cover of the property whose character is disputed.
